A Better Holyoke for All Political Action Committee
The mission of A Better Holyoke for All Political Action Committee
is to highlight a variety of issues that affect Holyoke's well being, to educate the citizens
and to alert tax payers and families to
critical decisions that would affect us all.
Our goals: We are an issue-based, rather than ideologically-based, organization, focused locally rather than nationally, with the goal of building our city's economy for the benefit of all our residents, rather than a select few. We take positions on issues in line with our goal, and on which there is broad consensus across our communities, despite all the "noise" coming from special interests. We back candidates who stand with us on those issues.
Hey, everyone. The 'Holyoke Backward' endorsements have been mailed out, telling everyone who will listen to vote just for their "slate". Most of them are predictable - what you would normally expect - since this is a radical group who likes to raise taxes, defund police, and perpetuate gas moratoriums, among other things. All of their candidates are a relative perfect match for those goals.
Let's all remember who voted against ShotSpotter: Jenny Rivera (Ward 1), Israel Rivera (At Large) and Jose Maldonado-Velez (At Large) along with No Show Kocayne Givner (Ward 4).
The group also says it supports the environment here in Holyoke, which is a really interesting claim since they also say they research all of the candidates. One of their endorsements went to Patti Devine who has the infamous distinction of having the worst environmental record in Holyoke history by being one of the few people who actually voted in September of 1999 to give a permit to locate a quarry on our precious Mt. Tom. There is a reason she was voted out of office years ago! Apparently that does not matter to them because she said she will change her vote to let everyone have backyard chickens... so, who cares about the 252 foot crater in the middle of our national landmark and the permanent damage to the ecosystem she supported?!? Talk about hypocrisy from this group.
Don't just vote for a slate. Resist the List. On Nov. 7, vote for people who do their own thinking and use common sense. Those are two other precious resources in short supply in Holyoke
Better Holyoke for All PAC is endorsing candidates based on two criteria in the November 7 election:
(1) Ability to be independent and do one's own thinking, and
(2) Capacity to use Common Sense.
A Better Holyoke for All Political Action Committee
Therefore happily endorses the following candidates for voters to consider on November 7
- City Council At Large (Vote for not more than 6)
- Michael Sullivan
- Kevin Jourdain
- Howard Greaney
- City Council by Ward
- Victor Machado (Ward 1)
- Carmen Ocasio (Ward 2)
- David Bartley (Ward 3)
- Ruth Garcia (Ward 4)
- Linda Vacon (Ward 5)
- Eileen Brady Leahy (Ward 7)
- School Committee At Large
Issue Two: Restoring local control of our schools.
Issue One: Supporting the Holyoke Gas & Electric as one of our city's greatest assets.
The HG&E is a great incentive for bringing businesses into the city. We don't want to completely contradict that by preventing it from doing its job, for what are essentially political, rather than practical, reasons. While we support the preservation of our natural environment, that is not best accomplished through actions that are at best largely symbolic, and in fact become completely counterproductive by forcing many of our residents to continue burning dirtier and more costly fuels. Therefore, we call for an end to the natural gas moratorium currently in effect in Holyoke. The Holyoke Gas and Electric can be a driving force for the city's future development. Our city's economic development is being held back because we are refusing to allow new businesses and residences to access natural gas. Thousands of Holyoke residents rely on natural gas service and they should not be forced to pay tens of thousands of dollars in conversion costs. We support working on a long term solution to enhance our natural gas capacity to Holyoke that can end the natural gas moratorium quickly. The city should avoid the hundreds of millions in costs and rate increases our city and residents cannot afford by preserving our natural gas service.
(Click to Enlarge, Save/Print, Back button to Return)
There has really been no upside to receivership. There has neither been qualified leadership, nor have we received any more resources than we otherwise would have. When a community is invested in public education, it necessarily brings the various constituencies within it together to fight for a common cause, whereas when local support is lost the community becomes fragmented and disengaged, and the receivership has certainly accelerated that disengagement. The state needs to provide adequate funding now, as well as to listen to parents and teachers in order to turn the schools around. The issues related to long-term student achievement far transcend quick fixes, expensive new buildings and top-heavy administration.
Issue Three: Keeping Holyoke an affordable place to live.
City finances in recent years have been poorly managed. Taxes are at an all-time high. Holyoke now has the highest residential tax burden in the state. We have a shrinking commercial base. Even though more and more taxes are paid each year, there is never enough. Free cash is gone. Holyoke leaders need to act more responsibly to ensure department budgets are not overspent, and that cash reserves are properly maintained, and that the city has an effective capital plan. It is striking how unequitable the current system of local funding based on property values is for Holyoke as compared to our wealthier neighbors; we need leadership that will advocate for a fairer system, and our fair share of state aid. The state's reliance on current property tax system and antiquated funding formulas is no longer acceptable and has significantly contributed to the city's structural deficit. Moreover, these revenue streams do not account for the systemic poverty and social needs of a community like Holyoke. There is nothing progressive about regressive taxation. The formula by which Holyoke is funded by the state is very regressive and needs to be updated now.
A Better Holyoke for All Political Action Committee, David Yos Treasurer
Back to Top